03-16-2017, 09:13 AM
I just doubt lenscore resolution result reliability. And with reliability in doubt, one can't say which lens test results to go on and which not (a bad issue with DXO).
On the 105mm f1.4, lensrentals was very impressed with it too.
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/11...nch-tests/
As was lenstip.
http://www.lenstip.com/492.4-Lens_review...ution.html
On the Sigma, it scores very high on lenstip too:
http://www.lenstip.com/491.4-Lens_review...ution.html
It is not a big secret that the end score from Photozone mostly is about the resolution test, maybe a bit about exorbitant distortion, and the rest (LoCA, CA, flare, veiling, contrast, fore- and background bokeh at different distances, astigmatism and coma, light loss, field curvature at different distances) play only a small role if even that.
The thing is that different aspects are of different importance to different individuals. So you can't really give a optical lens score that is right.
On the 105mm f1.4, lensrentals was very impressed with it too.
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/11...nch-tests/
As was lenstip.
http://www.lenstip.com/492.4-Lens_review...ution.html
On the Sigma, it scores very high on lenstip too:
http://www.lenstip.com/491.4-Lens_review...ution.html
It is not a big secret that the end score from Photozone mostly is about the resolution test, maybe a bit about exorbitant distortion, and the rest (LoCA, CA, flare, veiling, contrast, fore- and background bokeh at different distances, astigmatism and coma, light loss, field curvature at different distances) play only a small role if even that.
The thing is that different aspects are of different importance to different individuals. So you can't really give a optical lens score that is right.