06-25-2010, 01:50 PM
[quote name='Klaus' date='25 June 2010 - 08:41 AM' timestamp='1277451671' post='682']
Sorry, but the resolution figures are also affected albeit to a disadvantage of MFT.
[/quote]
I understand that, Klaus. My thought was the comparison would be overall fair, because while MFT would get better ca and distortion figures, it would be "paid for" by worse resolution -- so in terms of an overall balance, you would be able to give an overall result based on the measured resolution, ca and distortion which wouldn't be unfair to either side, because while mft would gain from the ca and distortion correction, the other formats would gain from the uninterpolated native resolution, and your overall judgements would reflect the overall results that users could expect from the lenses.
Sorry, but the resolution figures are also affected albeit to a disadvantage of MFT.
[/quote]
I understand that, Klaus. My thought was the comparison would be overall fair, because while MFT would get better ca and distortion figures, it would be "paid for" by worse resolution -- so in terms of an overall balance, you would be able to give an overall result based on the measured resolution, ca and distortion which wouldn't be unfair to either side, because while mft would gain from the ca and distortion correction, the other formats would gain from the uninterpolated native resolution, and your overall judgements would reflect the overall results that users could expect from the lenses.