Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparision of MTF values old vs new tests
#2
Welcome on board Smile There are two reasons why your assumptions will not lead to a valid result. First of all, a comparison across several test systems is an invalid approach in itself. It's tempting to 'normalize' the results, but bound to fail because so many factors influence a test system's maximum resolution, among those the sensor characteristics and the raw converter used in the analysis workflow. Short summary: the MTF results are not comparable across different systems (where every test camera we use is a 'system' in this context).

 

In addition, you're comparing apples and oranges anyway Smile The AF-S 20/1.8 was tested on the D3x, so a full frame camera. The Tamron review is fairly dated and based on the D200, a DX camera with a smaller sensor. So border and corner values in those reviews refer to very different spots in the image circle of the lenses.

 

I can tell you, however, that the Nikkor does provide better sharpness (and way less CAs), and in addition opens up a few additional creative options with its fast f/1.8 aperture and the corresponding shallow depth of field. On the other hand, you lose the flexibility of the zoom.

 

Give me a little time, and I may be able to provide a few numbers so you can compare yourself Smile

 

-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

  


Messages In This Thread
Comparision of MTF values old vs new tests - by Kutlu Kutluer - 12-19-2016, 11:43 PM
Comparision of MTF values old vs new tests - by mst - 12-20-2016, 08:14 AM
Comparision of MTF values old vs new tests - by Kutlu Kutluer - 12-20-2016, 02:47 PM
Comparision of MTF values old vs new tests - by Kutlu Kutluer - 12-21-2016, 11:53 AM
Comparision of MTF values old vs new tests - by Kutlu Kutluer - 12-29-2016, 04:47 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)