You are arguing about EOSRP fine, here's an advice from an actual owner.
I don't believe in a do it all camera, and I prefer having more than one camera.
If you shoot JPG EOSRP is at least as good as the competition and in my subjective opinion superior, the color rendition is very well studied, if you shoot RAW and come from a traditional school or you are an ex film shooter, EOSRP won't disappoint you.
Now if you shoot RAW and want to do extremes like puling shadows 3 f stops and more EOSRP is not the camera for you, just look elewhere.
BTW do you know that EOSRP has cRAW which is a lossy RAW compression where most losses are actually in dynamic range and plenty of EOSRP users actually use cRAW ?
I rarely use EOSRP at base ISO, at middle to high ISO, the dynamic range vs competitors is almost the same, and since I am an old school guy who tries to get things right straight out of the camera and hates computer sitting, I just do minor adjustments on RAW files, so I have nothing to complain about
I don't believe in a do it all camera, and I prefer having more than one camera.
If you shoot JPG EOSRP is at least as good as the competition and in my subjective opinion superior, the color rendition is very well studied, if you shoot RAW and come from a traditional school or you are an ex film shooter, EOSRP won't disappoint you.
Now if you shoot RAW and want to do extremes like puling shadows 3 f stops and more EOSRP is not the camera for you, just look elewhere.
BTW do you know that EOSRP has cRAW which is a lossy RAW compression where most losses are actually in dynamic range and plenty of EOSRP users actually use cRAW ?
I rarely use EOSRP at base ISO, at middle to high ISO, the dynamic range vs competitors is almost the same, and since I am an old school guy who tries to get things right straight out of the camera and hates computer sitting, I just do minor adjustments on RAW files, so I have nothing to complain about