(05-18-2021, 02:46 PM)davidmanze Wrote: No get away Marcus your kidding !!........ did I say generic ...... silly me ........ of course I meant ...... genital ......
Oh, well, of course... how could I NOT see that
(05-18-2021, 02:46 PM)davidmanze Wrote: Don't forget what keeps the D500 as one of Nikon's best selling DX bodies ......... reach for birders ........ all done with FF glass to boot !!
Well, yes... certainly don't forget that, for sure, I loved the D500 for that reason. But how many of the D500 owners have used it with dedicated DX lenses? A minority, I'm pretty sure.
(05-18-2021, 01:43 PM)Rover Wrote: Well, a DX (or any APS-C) camera really begs for a dedicated ultrawide lens, because using full-frame ultrawides is usually not super efficient (sincerely yours, Captain Obvious).
Not so sure, to be honest. It seems to me that Z DX currently is meant to drag new customers into the system and at some later point hopefully make them upgrade to FX.
With a well equipped system like Fuji XF around, I don't see how Z DX could be an option at all for anyone seriously interested in an APS-C-only solution.
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com