Posts: 6,717
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
11-02-2021, 07:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2021, 07:23 AM by Brightcolours.)
A bit surreal, being stonewalled like this when pointing out the (should be) obvious (that 60Hz is so fast that it never can cause framing issues with BIF), especially surreal that I am defending the Z9, when everyone who I debate calls me a Canon fanboy and the Z9 obviously is not a Canon camera.
Anyway, this Nikon Z9 appears to indeed be a pretty awesome camera, where Nikon shows as big jump in its processing, performance and implementations as Canon did with the R5 and R6 (which already was pretty big), or maybe even bigger
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
18
What I wish for is a smaller body like the Z6, but with the Z9 innards :-)
Posts: 6,717
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
(11-02-2021, 08:51 AM)thxbb12 Wrote: What I wish for is a smaller body like the Z6, but with the Z9 innards :-)
That would be almost an R5 ;-)
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
18
Except for the wrong mount ;-)
For my needs, the Z mount has more interesting options than RF.
Posts: 6,717
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
(11-02-2021, 01:19 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: Except for the wrong mount ;-)
For my needs, the Z mount has more interesting options than RF.
Yeah, I can understand that.
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
18
Yes, that's what I'm thinking as well.
I'm very much looking forward to the review of the new Z 24-120 f4 :-)