(02-05-2022, 03:14 PM)toni-a Wrote: frankly I would use this one over a biog and bulky 15-35f2.8, aside from some purple fringing few will see the difference on A4 or A3 printsI am considering both, but will likely get the 16 first. They are quite different in use after all. However, saving for an R5 first ....
Actually I am consiedring it despite owning Tokina 16-28 that has a rather good image quality and that I almost never used
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....