Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
09-19-2016, 05:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-19-2016, 05:54 PM by Brightcolours.)
18 FPS with AF. 60 FPS no AF. Larger battery. 20.4mp sensor, no AA-filter, higher read out and better DR. 4k, 237mbpsec.120fps EVF. 50MP images composed of 8 shots with moving sensor.
Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
09-19-2016, 08:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-19-2016, 08:22 PM by Brightcolours.)
I wonder how the guy with gloves will operate that freeze proof miniature camera, though.
The camera is impressive, the live presentation was cringe worthy. They even showed a 3x2 DSLR image with a fox during the presentation, a bit odd.
Posts: 1,226
Threads: 109
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
18
18 FPS with AF is very impressive. Looks like they are going for the sports/wildlife crowd.
Impressive specs. Paired with good lenses it may be a great out door / travel / sport kit
Posts: 631
Threads: 18
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
2
Did Oly initially said "in development", or I missed something?
Posts: 631
Threads: 18
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
2
09-23-2016, 03:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-23-2016, 03:52 PM by borisbg.)
Why MFT cameras don't offer ISO 100,64,25 instead of 200? If the signal is not amplified as much, wouldn't be better for image quality, (noise and DR)?
Posts: 1,226
Threads: 109
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
18
100% agreed. It's something that has been puzzling me.
It's also annoying because one can't shoot a fast lens wide-open bright light (except with ND filters which is annoying).
Posts: 2,505
Threads: 564
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
14
A sensor is not like film, it has one ISO speed the rest is by amplification of the signal.
All manufacturers chose baseline ISO at the most profitable range.
On my 5D ISO 50 is not better than ISO 100.
In the past many Nikon cameras didn't have less than ISO 200