Posts: 3,042
Threads: 31
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
20
Re-test? Well, only if you count the EOS review of the same lens...
Posts: 2,441
Threads: 320
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
20
Yes, that's how I meant it
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
Posts: 7,954
Threads: 1,831
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
To be honest - we are trying to minimize this. Not because we want to but because there are too many new lenses out there.
Posts: 4,031
Threads: 41
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
22
That's the advantages of lenscore's concept: To skip the proprietary body and make their own sensor working and measuring comparatively. With their scores, one could compare otherwise incomparable "lenses" - but then I still need the body of the brand to make the glass shine on my own pictures.
That's the reason I'm still sticking to PZ. Here one can get a "besides the numbers, the lens looks like..." view.
Posts: 642
Threads: 18
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
2
04-28-2016, 05:01 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-28-2016, 05:08 AM by borisbg.)
I would ask how does it fair against Nikkor 24/1.8? And maybe Sigma 24/1.4 Art, even its in different class.
Posts: 7,954
Threads: 1,831
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
Please don't distract Markus.
He has two lenses on his desk that collected more dust than those 150-600mm lenses of mine...
Posts: 4,031
Threads: 41
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
22
See, that's why you are so cheerful about weather-proof. It's also waiting-proof.
:lol: