Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mirrorless AF tracking finally on-par with high end DSLRs?
#1
All in all, very impressive. Plus, you get 100% AF coverage with tracking:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-a6300/8

 

Eye tracking with multiple faces is equally impressive (although this is from the A7II):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhkH7wIP...u.be&t=57s

 

I wonder when Canikon is finally going to wake up and seriously enter the mirrorless market. AF is (was?) their last stand...

--Florent

Flickr gallery
#2
I've watched tracking AF improve over time, although without 1st hand experience I can't comment too much. The skateboarder example seemed ok. I always felt that one part of DSLR tracking is they don't have as much scene data to interpret as mirrorless could, even with RGB metering sensors finding their way into lower end bodies over time. Also I don't think I've seen any comparisons in more challenging scenarios yet, like lower light levels, and smaller subjects.

<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
#3
High end DSLRs?  on par with the DX1/D4S/D5?  I think not.......low to midrange maybe.......

 

  .....it's getting there but let's not jump the gun........there's still some way to go....for demanding situations in sports where it counts....and viewfinder lag.......however it will get there......but I need it now! 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4f2drPwZvo

  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)