[youpii]

If we are going to introduce a paywall for ad-blocker users at some stage, we'll lose a lot of readers, of course. Now does it make a difference to lose ad-blocker users that only produce costs ? I mean think about that for a sec. It's like those who do fare evasion in public transport won't use public transport anymore. How much would this hurt the public transport company ... ? 

 

But maybe I'm wrong about all this. We'll see. As for the time being photozone will remain public.

 

It would make sense to lower the costs by cutting out readers that only generate costs.

I'm a bit curious about the 30.000$ costs. Didn't costs went down with Amazon hosting and the like?