Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced
#22
Well, the Canon 300mm f/4 IS and the classic Nikkor 300mm f/4 are just as big and a 300m f/4 lens remains a 300mm f/4 lens.

But yes, the smaller image field should have made it a little less fat at least.

While not really comparable the Pentax 60-250mm f/4 - thus an APS-C lens - is in a similar ballpark. 

 

About skills & size - there are many example of "too big" lenses from classic manufacturers - take the Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 or Milvius 21mm f/2.8, the Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8, Canon 35mm f/1.4 II or a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART.

  


Messages In This Thread
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Guest - 01-06-2016, 08:22 PM
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Scythels - 01-08-2016, 06:45 PM
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Klaus - 01-08-2016, 09:47 PM
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Scythels - 01-10-2016, 12:55 AM
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Scythels - 01-10-2016, 05:15 PM
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Lassoni - 01-11-2016, 01:38 AM
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Scythels - 01-11-2016, 03:06 AM
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 300mm f/4 IS PRO announced - by Scythels - 01-12-2016, 03:31 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)