11-16-2017, 03:44 PM
In practical terms, probably nobody.
You can't put a µ4/3 lens on any other format, so if you're using that, you only have this sensor size for reference. Putting a full frame lens on a µ4/3 body is, most of the time, not very optimal either (unless it's a long tele you want to make even longer).
I can admit to never own a full-frame camera (and not going to change that any time soon) so why does that format have to be a benchmark for me, I don't know. Most µ4/3 users are probably the same.
Anyhoo, the G9 and 200mm lens. Somehow I doubt they're going to sell a lot of units.
And no, the Canon 200mm f/2.8 lens is not entirely comparable as that is a 20+ year old design with no IS. The internal construction is probably very different even if you disregard that fact.
You can't put a µ4/3 lens on any other format, so if you're using that, you only have this sensor size for reference. Putting a full frame lens on a µ4/3 body is, most of the time, not very optimal either (unless it's a long tele you want to make even longer).
I can admit to never own a full-frame camera (and not going to change that any time soon) so why does that format have to be a benchmark for me, I don't know. Most µ4/3 users are probably the same.
Anyhoo, the G9 and 200mm lens. Somehow I doubt they're going to sell a lot of units.
And no, the Canon 200mm f/2.8 lens is not entirely comparable as that is a 20+ year old design with no IS. The internal construction is probably very different even if you disregard that fact.