11-16-2017, 09:12 PM
No one was hammering anything. Others were trying to scale an apple to a pineapple. Same characters in the word, just a bit more. Anyone who sees any benefit in his or her photography by knowing theoretical nerdy stuff? Anyone believing a D3x with 24 MP will allow two steps more ISO than one of these days 24 MP APS-C sensors of, say, a D7200? Witch a credible proof, not only more nerd blurb.
Gaining 2 stops just because it's "a" FF is a bit daring to say. Some FF gain, others much less so:
![[Image: i-G5Qxv7P.png]](https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-G5Qxv7P/0/a6d74d5f/O/i-G5Qxv7P.png)
It's not to prove something or somebody wrong, I'd just be careful to generalize in this already very unscientific debate ^_^
Also, investing the time we lost now in learning to deal better with our cameras could be an idea... at the end the picture counts and no one looking at it will waste any time to make equivalencing calculations. The concept takes too many things for granted and perfectly scalable.
Gaining 2 stops just because it's "a" FF is a bit daring to say. Some FF gain, others much less so:
It's not to prove something or somebody wrong, I'd just be careful to generalize in this already very unscientific debate ^_^
Also, investing the time we lost now in learning to deal better with our cameras could be an idea... at the end the picture counts and no one looking at it will waste any time to make equivalencing calculations. The concept takes too many things for granted and perfectly scalable.