+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Good and bad lens copies - brands summary (/showthread.php?tid=3852)
Pages:
1
2
Good and bad lens copies - brands summary - mst - 06-15-2010
I just realized this paragraph could be misunderstood:
[quote name='mst' date='15 June 2010 - 10:37 AM' timestamp='1276594628' post='534']
if you purchase a fast tele prime, that carries APO in its name (for a price, that would have bought you a Nikon 200/2 VR just a year ago, before Nikon raised the prices) you'd probably expect it to be free of LoCAs.[/quote]
This was meant as a general statement, I did not want to indicate that I had purchased a Leica lens for that price (rest assured I didn't). I just wanted to put Leica's extremely high prices into perspective.
-- Markus
Good and bad lens copies - brands summary - Martin_MM - 06-15-2010
Again, thanks for the open answer. I think (and you know that too, for sure ;-) that you have an ideal combination of cameras - what else should one want? Take my bow. I was just curious what the hardworking lens reviewer likes to carry the most today :-)
I´m looking forward to your upcoming reviews very much, hope your attitude will never be spoiled by the ubiquitous commercialism and your verditcs won´t be spoiled by the american attitude (i.e. the top, "excellent" mark is given to every average product).
(maybe) see you in another thread,
Martin