Missing Zeiss reviews - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Thread: Missing Zeiss reviews (/showthread.php?tid=1266) Pages:
1
2
|
Missing Zeiss reviews - youpii - 01-31-2015 Hello Some Zeiss primes have never been reviewed by PZ:
<p style="margin-left:40px;"> Primes are probably faster to review than zooms and much less likely to be decentered. Could you please put them in the pipeline? Missing Zeiss reviews - felix - 02-01-2015 Is the Planar 1.4/50 ZA optically different from the ZF & ZE versions? Both of them have been reviewed already Missing Zeiss reviews - dave9t5 - 02-01-2015 Quote:Hello Some other Zeiss primes: the Otii and the Loxii Missing Zeiss reviews - youpii - 02-02-2015 Quote:Some other Zeiss primes: You're right. I was thinking of the Sony-specific Zeiss lenses but my post was not clear about that. Missing Zeiss reviews - Klaus - 02-02-2015 I will test the 55. Not sure about the others. Missing Zeiss reviews - felix - 02-02-2015 Quote:the Oti These would probably be the most boring reviews ever - the 1.4/55 is perfect, the 1.4/85 is better Missing Zeiss reviews - Brightcolours - 02-02-2015 Quote:Is the Planar 1.4/50 ZA optically different from the ZF & ZE versions? Both of them have been reviewed alreadyQuite different. The Sony lens is an autofocus lens costing around $1500. This is the ZE/ZF manual focus lens ($725): This the Sony Zeiss: Missing Zeiss reviews - dave9t5 - 02-02-2015 Quote:These would probably be the most boring reviews ever - the 1.4/55 is perfect, the 1.4/85 is better True dat ! Missing Zeiss reviews - AN2 - 02-02-2015 And don't forget the FE16-35 Missing Zeiss reviews - Klaus - 02-03-2015 The FE 16-35 is scheduled for next week actually. |