+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: Not that impressed (/showthread.php?tid=1358)
Pages:
1
2
Not that impressed - Klaus - 09-21-2014
I just checked my vacation images taken with the A6000 and the Zeiss 16-70.
I have to admit ... I am not thrilled by the quality. The borders are rather soft.
Back to MFT for me I reckon.
Not that impressed - goran h - 09-21-2014
Just back to MFT? What about Fuji?
Not that impressed - Klaus - 09-21-2014
MFT for zoom lenses. Fuji for primes. ;-)
Not that impressed - youpii - 09-21-2014
Stop using zooms
Not that impressed - goran h - 09-21-2014
Stop using zooms - You are right, but there are some exceptions. Oly 12-40 is one.
Not that impressed - Kodachrome 25 - 09-21-2014
Quote:MFT for zoom lenses. Fuji for primes. ;-)What zoom lenses are in your backpack for a one-week trek?
Do you still have the Leica D Vario-Elmar 14-150mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS?
Not that impressed - Klaus - 09-21-2014
Quote:What zoom lenses are in your backpack for a one-week trek?
Do you still have the Leica D Vario-Elmar 14-150mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS?
Well, I just ordered the Oly 12-40 and 40-150 ;-)
Not that impressed - Kodachrome 25 - 09-21-2014
Quote:Well, I just ordered the Oly 12-40 and 40-150 ;-)
I guess it's the small an lightweight Olympus M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 ED R MSC and not the new f/2.8 !-)
No need for the Olympus M.Zuiko 9-18mm f/4-5.6 ED?
Not that impressed - stoppingdown - 09-21-2014
I hope that before leaving it go you found the time for a review, including numbers :-) I've been using it since a long time and - while I perfectly understand your point of view - for me is ok. Too expensive for quality, but it has been an improvement relative to what I was using before, both in terms of size/weight and IQ.
Still I'm curious to see the MTF numbers.
Not that impressed - Klaus - 09-21-2014
Quote:I guess it's the small an lightweight Olympus M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 ED R MSC and not the new f/2.8 !-)
No need for the Olympus M.Zuiko 9-18mm f/4-5.6 ED?
Actually for light weight travel I still have the Panasonic 40-150 which produces quite amazing results actually.
And I still have the Panasonic 7-14/4.
Admittedly I ordered the 40-150/2.8 primarily for testing but you never know ;-)
Quote:I hope that before leaving it go you found the time for a review, including numbers :-) I've been using it since a long time and - while I perfectly understand your point of view - for me is ok. Too expensive for quality, but it has been an improvement relative to what I was using before, both in terms of size/weight and IQ.
Still I'm curious to see the MTF numbers.
I will, of course, continue to test Sony equipment. During the next 3 months there'll be at least 6 tests on my list.