+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: Not that impressed (/showthread.php?tid=1358)
Pages:
1
2
Not that impressed - frank - 09-22-2014
For me, MFTs are for fast primes, DSLRs for zooms.
Not that impressed - joachim - 09-22-2014
Quote:MFT for zoom lenses. Fuji for primes. ;-)
Your verdict on the Fuji 18-55/2.8-4 is extremely positive. Stating it is a reason to enter the system. Not any longer? I have an X20 and am considering moving to Fuji for the nice JPEG colours and very usable in-camera RAW processor.
What mFT body are you after?
Did you not find time to test/assess the Zeiss before the trip? If it as bad as you say, you should have noticed within a few frames.
Not that impressed - Klaus - 09-22-2014
MFT or Fuji is primarily a question of size. The 55-200mm is a rather big lens for instance.
Olympus lenses - at least the mid to pro range - are also better centered.
The X-T1 is better (for photography) than all of the MFT cameras though.
I am still thrilled by Fuji - don't understand me wrong here.
On the MFT side I am leaning towards the GMs. But again, I'm mostly into outdoors.
Not that impressed - Guest - 10-22-2014
Quote:I just checked my vacation images taken with the A6000 and the Zeiss 16-70.
I have to admit ... I am not thrilled by the quality. The borders are rather soft.
Is the review of the Zeiss 16-70 still in the works?
Not that impressed - dave9t5 - 10-22-2014
Quote:Is the review of the Zeiss 16-70 still in the works?
http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/topic/3803-some-new-lenses-in-da-lab/?p=28256