Sony RX10 & Pana FZ1000 - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Sony RX10 & Pana FZ1000 (/showthread.php?tid=1424) Pages:
1
2
|
Sony RX10 & Pana FZ1000 - Klaus - 08-19-2014 Quote:So, what about A6000 + 16-70 f/4 + LA-EA4 (160g) + Minolta 100-200 f/4.5 (375g) ? The former two are "given", aren't they ? The latter two weight 535g, less than RX10. Everything is top quality, and you are still far away from 20kg bag. Sorry but I am already perfectly fine with MFT quality. I have a GH3 which produces great results. I am a non-believer in ancient lenses so something like the Minolta 100-200mm will not happen on my side. Technically the Canon EF-S 55-250mm STM IS could be interesting (using the Canon AF adapter). Sony RX10 & Pana FZ1000 - Guest - 08-20-2014 When I say "small sensor" I don't mean APS-C; this is what I use, and I like the perspective it produces. I don't care with comparing it to full frame. I do claim 2/3 inch (KM A2) is "small", and I guess 1 inch would be felt as "small" too. Cannot comment on MFT. Another claim: there are compact-enough kits based on APS-C sensor, thus I would not look at smaller sensor sizes at all. Sony RX10 & Pana FZ1000 - Brightcolours - 08-20-2014 AF will be sloooow on the Sony formerly known as Nex (TSFKAN). If you can't live with the slow focus, a Canon EOS M2 with adapter will perform much better. But that camera has no EVF. Best would be the EOS 100D/SL1, but with each EOS "solution" the Sonyzeiss 16-70mm f4 will be useless. Sony RX10 & Pana FZ1000 - Klaus - 08-20-2014 Which is why I will take the Sony 70-300G. ^_^ But it'll stay mostly in the car |