Opticallimits
Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - Printable Version

+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 (/showthread.php?tid=1790)



Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - Sylvain - 08-02-2013

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr5-et-voila-first-picture-of-the-sigma-24-70mm-f2-0-full-frame-lens/

 

Sigma really is on fire.

 

 




Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - Klaus - 08-02-2013

IF this is real, I'm a little wondering about the size of the front filter. 102mm ?




Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - Sylvain - 08-02-2013

I thought about playing with the mount to scale it up against other lenses, but can't be bothered. It's going to be a little big, for sure, but judging how many pro still carry their bricks around, not too many will care, or will they ?



Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - popo - 08-02-2013

Who rated it 5? I don't see that on SAR, and CR put it as 1 on their scale which means it is practically worthless.

I'd love to see such a lens, but I'm really sceptical if it could be done for a reasonable cost and quality. If they do a full frame f/2 zoom, I'd expect a shorter zoom range.


Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - Sylvain - 08-02-2013

Quote:Who rated it 5? I don't see that on SAR, and CR put it as 1 on their scale which means it is practically worthless.


I'd love to see such a lens, but I'm really sceptical if it could be done for a reasonable cost and quality. If they do a full frame f/2 zoom, I'd expect a shorter zoom range.
Sorry, it was a SR3 (older posts) and the picture, on closer inspection, looks like a collage of the 18-35 a the 120-300... no ?



Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - Guest - 08-02-2013

Not sure if it is true (after all it is only a rumour - well the rumour is certainly true but the lens might be fiction but if this rumour is true...) but if so I have only one comment: TOOOOO HEAVY.




Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - popo - 08-02-2013

Define too heavy? I can't imagine it being worse than the 120-300 so in that sense, I don't see a problem with it. The 120-300 is about my personal all day hand holding limit... and I have weedy arms too.


Sigma 24-70 f/2 (!) Rumor rating 5 - Klaus - 08-03-2013

The 120-300mm is actually nice both in terms of size and weight - given its max. aperture.