+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: Sony NEX future (/showthread.php?tid=1921)
Sony NEX future - youpii - 05-04-2013
Quote:Honestly, FF mirrorless is a phantom pain. The images delivered from a Fuji are superb already and why bother with extra weight (from heavier lenses) ?
Contax G & Leica M lenses cover FF and are small
Sony NEX future - Klaus - 05-06-2013
Ask Markus about the vignetting ...
And 90mm are about the finish line in these system. A 300mm lens will be barely any smaller than on a DSLR.
Sony NEX future - mst - 05-06-2013
Quote:Ask Markus about the vignetting ...Yep. Peak value measured is above 5 EV, IIRC. And no, that wasn't a cheap 3rd-party lens...
Vignetting numbers are generally much higher on the M9 than what we're used to with a DSLR (any sensor size).
Quote:And 90mm are about the finish line in these system. A 300mm lens will be barely any smaller than on a DSLR.The Leica 135/2.8 is already quite large. On a small camera (that's what we're all hoping for when dreaming of a full-frame mirrorless, right?) too large and too heavy. The combo is already quite arkward to handle.
-- Markus
Sony NEX future - felix - 05-06-2013
Quote:The Leica 135/2.8 is already quite large. On a small camera (that's what we're all hoping for when dreaming of a full-frame mirrorless, right?) too large and too heavy. The combo is already quite arkward to handle.
-- Markus
When I dream of full-frame mirrorless, I'm thinking about something that looks like a modern version of an Olympus OM-4TI or a Nikon FM3a, but with a slightly shorter flange distance (~36-42mm). Well, maybe that's just me :lol:
But I agree that small sensors (and thus smaller and lighter lenses) make more sense for rangefinder-esque mirrorless cameras.