+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Panasonic X 12-35 and 35-100 (/showthread.php?tid=2711)
Panasonic X 12-35 and 35-100 - Klaus - 01-11-2012
So they'll be f/2.8 ...
http://photorumors.com/2012/01/11/panasonic-ces-new-conversion-lenses-roadmap-concepts/
Which is fine for me at least.
58mm diameter so they seem to be fairly small.
Panasonic X 12-35 and 35-100 - Sylvain - 01-11-2012
It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.
I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again. [ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.
the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.
Panasonic X 12-35 and 35-100 - Guest - 01-12-2012
Nice. If it's indeed f/2.8 and that small, the 12-35mm might be the very first zoom lens for my Panny <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Panasonic X 12-35 and 35-100 - Klaus - 01-12-2012
[quote name='Sylvain' timestamp='1326320956' post='14769']
It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.
I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again. [ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.
the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.
[/quote]
These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.
Panasonic X 12-35 and 35-100 - Sylvain - 01-12-2012
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1326351603' post='14783']
These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.
[/quote]
I'd think they're essentially the same with added switch & stickers. Nothing I'd call new.
And a better matching than mine there :
http://www.43rumors.com/real-images-of-the-12-35mm-and-35-10mm-fast-x-zooms/