+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Nikon (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: Next PZ lens test report: Tamron AF 60mm f/2 SP Di II LD [IF] Macro (/showthread.php?tid=2922)
Next PZ lens test report: Tamron AF 60mm f/2 SP Di II LD [IF] Macro - mst - 10-06-2011
Retest on the D7000, text is mostly an exact copy of the earlier D200-based review:
http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/680-tamron6020nikon
-- Markus
Next PZ lens test report: Tamron AF 60mm f/2 SP Di II LD [IF] Macro - karlmera - 10-07-2011
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1317940184' post='12178']
Retest on the D7000, text is mostly an exact copy of the earlier D200-based review:
http://www.opticallimits.com/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/680-tamron6020nikon
-- Markus
[/quote]
My experiences with this lens are that the AF is not reliable at F/2 and the AF speed and precision is not comparable to the AF-S micro nikkors. But the resolution is very good "near infinity focus".
Very interesting again would be the performance at 1:5-1:1.
Next PZ lens test report: Tamron AF 60mm f/2 SP Di II LD [IF] Macro - Klaus - 10-07-2011
[quote name='karlmera' timestamp='1317964768' post='12182']
My experiences with this lens are that the AF is not reliable at F/2 and the AF speed and precision is not comparable to the AF-S micro nikkors. But the resolution is very good "near infinity focus".
Very interesting again would be the performance at 1:5-1:1.
[/quote]
Testing at macro distances is not possible at this stage.
Next PZ lens test report: Tamron AF 60mm f/2 SP Di II LD [IF] Macro - Rover - 10-07-2011
Looks like an excellent lens, and reportedly compatible with aps-h to boot. I was thinking about one. Thanks for the review!
Next PZ lens test report: Tamron AF 60mm f/2 SP Di II LD [IF] Macro - mousefire - 10-08-2011
It is said that its focus performance is poor (slow and lack of accuracy, can be seen from lenstip's review).And in your review it shows issues of underexposure, I wonder how serious it is. The Nikon edition seems better than Canon one,is it? Finally, when will the review of Tokina M35 pro come? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Next PZ lens test report: Tamron AF 60mm f/2 SP Di II LD [IF] Macro - Rover - 10-22-2011
I tried this lens today during a local photo fair on 1D Mark II N, and was very impressed. It's very sharp in the center - almost too sharp according to the unwilling model <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Despite being nominally APS-C it works on APS-H without excess vignetting. AF is very quiet but hunts sometimes due to lack of focus limiter. FTM is a great feature. The body is very slick looking as well. Do want. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />