Nikon 28-300 review - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Nikon 28-300 review (/showthread.php?tid=3514) |
Nikon 28-300 review - Guest - 12-05-2010 Hi markus, a long while ago you posted some sample pics of the Nikon 28-300. What happened to the review? Was the sample bad or did you just encounter time constraints? Nikon 28-300 review - mst - 12-05-2010 Just time constraints, the lens is not a bad one (in the sense that it does not seem to be a bad copy). Slight shift of priorities, too. The 24-120 VR will come first on FX, for example. Also, finally got a RAW converter for the D7000, at this very moment I'm shooting charts with it <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> -- Markus Nikon 28-300 review - genotypewriter - 12-06-2010 [quote name='mst' timestamp='1291584241' post='4776'] the lens is not a bad one [/quote] I guess you meant to say "not a bad zoom" ;D GTW |