Panasonic GH2 - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Panasonic GH2 (/showthread.php?tid=3650) |
Panasonic GH2 - Klaus - 09-21-2010 Here we go ... http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/gh2/index.html Panasonic GH2 - Guest - 09-21-2010 16 Mpix mFT with ISO 12,800... Yeah :-))) Panasonic GH2 - Klaus - 09-21-2010 [quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1285061182' post='3041'] 16 Mpix mFT with ISO 12,800... Yeah :-))) [/quote] According to Panasonic they improved the noise performance by 3db compared to the GH1. And the GH1 sensor is basically as good as a 12mp APS-C sensor (unlike the 12mp sensor used in the G1/2, E-P1/P2). ISO 12800 will stretch things, of course, but it will not be worse than on the EOS 7D and the likes. Panasonic GH2 - Klaus - 09-21-2010 [quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1285058662' post='3037'] Here we go ... [url="http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/gh2/index.html"]http://panasonic.net.../gh2/index.html[/url] [/quote] Pricing in Germany (MSRP inc. 19% tax): body only: 900EUR body w/14-42: 1000EUR body w/14-140: 1550EUR Panasonic GH2 - Guest - 09-21-2010 Hum. I wonder if they also improved the EVF (which was rather good on the gh1). Looks interesting though a bit pricey. Also what lenses can handle the pixel density ? Panasonic GH2 - wim - 09-21-2010 [quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1285065579' post='3045'] According to Panasonic they improved the noise performance by 3db compared to the GH1. And the GH1 sensor is basically as good as a 12mp APS-C sensor here (unlike the 12mp sensor used in the G1/2, E-P1/P2). ISO 12800 will stretch things, of course, but it will not be worse than on the EOS 7D and the likes. [/quote] 3 db is 1 stop, BTW. Kind regards, Wim Panasonic GH2 - Klaus - 09-21-2010 [quote name='you2' timestamp='1285072453' post='3054'] Hum. I wonder if they also improved the EVF (which was rather good on the gh1). Looks interesting though a bit pricey. Also what lenses can handle the pixel density ? [/quote] That's the key question (lenses). Panasonic GH2 - Guest - 09-21-2010 [quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1285065579' post='3045'] According to Panasonic they improved the noise performance by 3db compared to the GH1. And the GH1 sensor is basically as good as a 12mp APS-C sensor (unlike the 12mp sensor used in the G1/2, E-P1/P2). ISO 12800 will stretch things, of course, but it will not be worse than on the EOS 7D and the likes. [/quote] Mmm, according to dpreview GH1's DR is 1 stop behind Nikon D5000 in jpegs, and 2 stops behind in RAW. Noise wise it looks similar, just GH1 is applying some in-camera noise reduction to RAW files, which looks like a cheating to me Panasonic GH2 - wim - 09-21-2010 [quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1285083828' post='3063'] Mmm, according to dpreview GH1's DR is 1 stop behind Nikon D5000 in jpegs, and 2 stops behind in RAW. Noise wise it looks similar, just GH1 is applying some in-camera noise reduction to RAW files, which looks like a cheating to me [/quote] <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Quite interesting, because Nikon is cheating also <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />. Kind regards, Wim Panasonic GH2 - Sylvain - 09-26-2010 [quote name='you2' timestamp='1285072453' post='3054'] Hum. I wonder if they also improved the EVF (which was rather good on the gh1). Looks interesting though a bit pricey. Also what lenses can handle the pixel density ? [/quote] The 14-45 seems good enough to handle it. The 20mm too (at least center frame). The 7-14 doesn't look too bad either. All of these, according to DPR, go beyond nyquist frequency of G1 in the center area of the frame wide open or half a stop closed. |