+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: New Zeiss Batis is coming (/showthread.php?tid=380)
New Zeiss Batis is coming - Brightcolours - 04-07-2017
Quote:P.S. I do understand that at least this one has some objective value (unlike, say, that "Meyer-Optik" branded junk). Just not $2000.https://www.meyer-optik-goerlitz.com/en/primagon-24-f2.8
As I had said, it's not nearly as offensive as those "Trioplans" and whatnot.
How about this one?
€3999/4999.... For a 24mm f2.8. "For all mirrorless mounts". Of which only 2 (if they mean all including Leica) have FF sensors. For the APS-C rest, it is even more silly.
The Canon EF-S 24mm f2.8 STM costs €149. The Canon EF 24mm f2.8 IS USM costs €485. But those are not for mirrorless.
The Canon EF-M 22mm f2 STM costs around €200. The Fuji 23mm f2 costs €399.
New Zeiss Batis is coming - Rover - 04-07-2017
Quote:https://www.meyer-optik-goerlitz.com/en/primagon-24-f2.8Oh, don't even get me started on this one! I would rain black metal punishment and acid bile on that shameful company and their unfathomably insane and infinitely daft ways, trying desperately to out-Leica Leica while having absolutely no claim to that kind of lofty pretense -
How about this one?
€3999/4999.... For a 24mm f2.8. "For all mirrorless mounts". Of which only 2 (if they mean all including Leica) have FF sensors. For the APS-C rest, it is even more silly.
The Canon EF-S 24mm f2.8 STM costs €149. The Canon EF 24mm f2.8 IS USM costs €485. But those are not for mirrorless.
The Canon EF-M 22mm f2 STM costs around €200. The Fuji 23mm f2 costs €399.
Oh wait... I just did.
Seriously though, they are experts at hitting new lows every time they open their collective mouths to announce something. I hope the market forces - as skeptical as I am of these - would take care of that laughable operation in short order.Bleh, someone shut me up - I'm at it again. But you get the idea.