![]() |
new Sigma lenses finally announced - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: new Sigma lenses finally announced (/showthread.php?tid=394) |
new Sigma lenses finally announced - Klaus - 02-21-2017 http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/contemporary/c_100_400_5_63/ http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/art/a_24_70_28/ http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/art/a_14_18/features/ http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/art/a_135_18/specifications/ The 24-70 is not so hot if we can believe the MTFs new Sigma lenses finally announced - JJ_SO - 02-21-2017 Maybe, but not so bad either ![]() And as it's extending, the Minimal focus distance doesn't creep between 0.38 and 0.41 m like the new Nikon, but remains at 0.37 m throughout zoom range. new Sigma lenses finally announced - Brightcolours - 02-21-2017 Quote:Maybe, but not so bad either Though, the new Nikkor does extend too... So that must not be the entire reason ![]() new Sigma lenses finally announced - Brightcolours - 02-21-2017 The Irix 11mm f4 is finally being introduced too. http://en.irixlens.com/11mm new Sigma lenses finally announced - JJ_SO - 02-21-2017 The Nikon extends at the wide end - the Sigma at the long end. This does make a difference. new Sigma lenses finally announced - Brightcolours - 02-21-2017 That 100-400mm looks pretty neat (weight/size/MTF chart) too. Not as heavy breather (widening FOV towards MFD) as the Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 L IS USM for instance, with : 1.6m MFD, 1:3.8 = 0.26x magnification at 400mm setting. For (my) comparison, my Canon EF 70-200mm f4 L USM gets 0.21x at 1.2m, the EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 L IS USM gets 0.21 at 1.2m also. With its relative low weight and possibly nice price, it might just be a lens for me in future. new Sigma lenses finally announced - Brightcolours - 02-21-2017 Quote:The Nikon extends at the wide end - the Sigma at the long end. This does make a difference.You are right in that that is a difference. However, the old Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L USM also extends at the wide end, and does not show the variable MFD (as far as I know). So the correlation still is not that solid? new Sigma lenses finally announced - toni-a - 02-21-2017 Well at least for Canon and Nikon users a decent and adequately priced 24-70f2.8 stabilized would be most welcome new Sigma lenses finally announced - Brightcolours - 02-21-2017 Quote:Well at least for Canon and Nikon users a decent and adequately priced 24-70f2.8 stabilized would be most welcomeTamron offers that for a number of years now. new Sigma lenses finally announced - Klaus - 02-21-2017 Quote:That 100-400mm looks pretty neat (weight/size/MTF chart) too. Not as heavy breather (widening FOV towards MFD) as the Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 L IS USM for instance, with : It's still heavier than 1Kg. In the good ol days, there was the Minolta 100-400mm with just 840g. The MTFs are looking decent though. |