![]() |
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 USM L vs RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Canon EOS (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 USM L vs RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L (/showthread.php?tid=4162) |
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 USM L vs RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L - Klaus - 09-05-2018 EF: https://cweb.canon.jp/ef/lineup/standard/ef50-f12l/img/spec/mtf.png RF: https://cweb.canon.jp/eos/rf/lineup/rf50-f12l/image/spec/mtf.png Massive difference here RE: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 USM L vs RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L - JJ_SO - 09-05-2018 I'm just working with a graphical software which is messing up the generated figures - they appear to use something like that. I guess both are wrong Canon can't be that much worse than Nikon, even if the f/1.8 and f/1.2 will play a bit of a role. RE: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 USM L vs RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L - Klaus - 09-05-2018 Canon MTFs have always been simulated MTFs. And they are never comparable across manufacturers anyway. RE: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 USM L vs RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L - Brightcolours - 09-05-2018 f1.8 is more than a stop smaller than f1.2, JJ_SO. That plays a huge role.Both in lens design, and in stopping down difference. I doubt that the Canon is "much worse" at f1.8, but the Nikkor may be a tad better (Otus beater?). RE: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 USM L vs RF 50mm f/1.2 USM L - JJ_SO - 09-05-2018 I guessed that both are wrong because I first thought its the same lens graph from different sources and because I guessed the new ML lens is more even towards the right side - I was suspecting the graphics don't show the actual lens. I didn't compare it to Nikon and am well aware of the aperture stop difference. Otus beater? Maybe also DLSR limits stretcher, although it's not because of DSLR but because of the mounts of DLSRs. I'm really happy for both companies, they did well and the user will get an improvement - and not a copy of a Sony ![]() |