jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? (/showthread.php?tid=491) |
jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - Studor13 - 11-19-2016 It is as if people do not understand what 100% means. 100% means EVERY SINGLE shot you have ever taken. If you shot EVERY SINGLE image in RAW+JPEG you have still shot JPEG. You have not shot 100% RAW! But when someone says "NOT ONE JPEG IMAGE HAS HIT MY CARD†you are making an empty, ridiculous boast. I understand completely that people shoot 80, 90, maybe even 99% in RAW. But to suggest that you have not ONCE taken an image in JPEG, for example your next door neighbour's cat is plain delusional. Oh, about that guy who shoots 100% in RAW and in M mode? He is also the same guy who says that every single shot he makes is wide-open. It is just beneath him to stop down, even just once. Yeah, right. jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - toni-a - 11-19-2016 Quote:I shoot 100% Raw with my old 5D because it gives visibly better results than OOC Jpgswith 5D I tend to go the same way, not because of the JPG engine but 11MP RAW files are very easy to handle on modern fast PCs, you have everything a JPG file would give, previewing, thumbnails, almost any software can open them, you have the ability to correct any errors, and converting 50RAW files to JPG is a matter of minutes jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - toni-a - 11-19-2016 Quote:Obviously we don't have here a photographer but a gWC (guy With Camera) who has read some parts of articles, understood in bizarre way and who has weird conceptions, what does shooting mode have with image quality ? I knew a worst one, he always shoots on at the smallest aperture available (All pics he shared were at f32) jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - Arthur Macmillan - 11-22-2016 Quote: Here's a shot that I took of an egret through leaves and branches heavily cropped and PPed, I'm not claiming it's an art work or the like, but before processing it just wasn't a shot at all. I would call the photo an art work. A very interesting set of contrasts. Light/dark, big/small, subtle/imposing, still/dynamic. Also has a nice painterly quality. I can't really address the JPEG issue because I didn't realize there was a big difference in various implementations. jpeg out of camera (which is good enough) ? - davidmanze - 11-22-2016 Hey thanks Arthur, it's comments like that the make the thing worthwhile...... All the very best! |