+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Sony (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: Next OL lens lab test - Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 (/showthread.php?tid=5101)
Next OL lens lab test - Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 - Klaus - 08-02-2021
https://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/1115-tamron24f28
More of the same
RE: Next OL lens lab test - Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:@ - Rover - 08-02-2021
The 20 will be entertaining. EPZ found 8.1% native distortion which is the record value. Can it be called a fisheye when uncorrected, or does that term describe something more specific?
RE: Next OL lens lab test - Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:@ - stoppingdown - 08-02-2021
“The Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 stays a bit short of the optical quality that we have seen from the Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 ”
I think the latter should be the 35mm.
"... it still feels like an answer to a question that nobody has asked"
The reason for this triplet of lenses is macro capabilities, otherwise they actually don't make a lot of sense.
"The 20 will be entertaining. EPZ found 8.1% native distortion"
Yep, it's huge!
RE: Next OL lens lab test - Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:@ - Klaus - 08-02-2021
I didn't see 8% but it's bad, yes.
RE: Next OL lens lab test - Tamron 24mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:@ - Rover - 08-02-2021
Maybe it depends strongly on focus distance and their use (and testing) case was more conducive to revealing it, who knows. Their finding for the 24mm was 6.1%, so a bit more than what you discovered, for some reason. Even for the 35, they found 1.2%.