+- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Next OL lens test report - Laowa 90mm f/2.8 2x Ultra-Macro APO (/showthread.php?tid=5298)
Next OL lens test report - Laowa 90mm f/2.8 2x Ultra-Macro APO - Klaus - 06-13-2022
https://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/1142-laowa90f28
Pretty good ... with a couple of caveats.
RE: Next OL lens test report - Laowa 90mm f/2.8 2x Ultra-Macro APO - stoppingdown - 06-14-2022
«The background blur (shown to the left below) isn't ideal with some rough edges whereas the foreground blur is much smoother.»
Too bad given that for macro the foreground blur is often useless (there's nothing in front of the subject), but it's really good.
RE: Next OL lens test report - Laowa 90mm f/2.8 2x Ultra-Macro APO - Rover - 06-14-2022
On page 1: "it's a fully manual lens thus you will have to live without EXIF data, autofocus and a camera-controlled." <-- "aperture"?
RE: Next OL lens test report - Laowa 90mm f/2.8 2x Ultra-Macro APO - borisbg - 06-14-2022
(06-14-2022, 11:29 AM)stoppingdown Wrote: «The background blur (shown to the left below) isn't ideal with some rough edges whereas the foreground blur is much smoother.»
Too bad given that for macro the foreground blur is often useless (there's nothing in front of the subject), but it's really good.
Looking at the sample photos (next to the last) the harshness appear when lens is focused at medium distances or may be infinity, I can't tell the exact distance. When the object is close to the lens the blur looks perfect to my eyes.