Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Canon EOS (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party (/showthread.php?tid=5701) |
Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - toni-a - 04-23-2024 It doesn't seem like a coincidence as Sigma and Tamron announced on the same day several RF mount lenses all APS-C... Seems Canon will open APS-C mount and license only few full frame lenses RE: Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - Rover - 04-23-2024 I'm glad to have been proven wrong on this count. The 23rd is always a lucky day for me. Not that I'm going to jump to Canon RF (from EF/Z) over these pieces of news, but I'm sure Canon will be glad to hear that I dislike them a little less, starting today. RE: Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - Klaus - 04-23-2024 Basically, they outsourced APS-C to third-party vendors because they couldn't be bothered to support it properly... RE: Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - toni-a - 04-23-2024 Canon current management has only one target: income, although they are doing well from the income side, that's a dangerous approach on the long term. Their sales come from a wide fan base and loyal customers which is their most valuable asset, with their recent actions they risk of losing it, and they have nobody to blame but themselves RE: Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - Rover - 04-23-2024 (04-23-2024, 11:18 AM)Klaus Wrote: Basically, they outsourced APS-C to third-party vendors because they couldn't be bothered to support it properly... That's one way of putting it, although it's kind of unobvious from the "earnings" standpoint. After all, if I had come to own these lenses, I would not have been moving anywhere after that. The lenses are as good as it gets within the (sub-)system. Of course a telezoom is missing still, and a macro lens (or a few) as well. But I don't think Sigma or Tamron have APS-C telezooms out for any mount at present. RE: Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - toni-a - 04-23-2024 (04-23-2024, 01:23 PM)Rover Wrote:(04-23-2024, 11:18 AM)Klaus Wrote: Basically, they outsourced APS-C to third-party vendors because they couldn't be bothered to support it properly... Most of the guys I talk to, tend to buy full frame tele lenses because they are "future proof " in case they move full frame later on. and they work pretty well on APS-C RE: Seems Canon has opened RFs mount for third party - Rover - 04-23-2024 Yeah but Sigma has no APS-C telezooms for mirrorless. And if their FF lenses will not be brought to RF, this leaves a gap. Meanwhile, Canon only has the woeful 55-210/5-7.1 for RF-S. BTW I agree about your assessment that "Canon current management has only one target: income", although this is more or less the goal for any commercial enterprise anyway. |