Posts: 21
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2018
Reputation:
0
... arrived in the lab. That is besides 2xLxx and 1x Cxx and another Sxx lens. ;-)
Posts: 4,031
Threads: 41
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
22
I think, I will go now and get 4 or 5 Aliases. One never knows who hides behind "forum".
It's Light, Contrast and Shutter, no? Or Linhof, Contax and Soligor, as OL wants to dive in the dust of history.
Posts: 6,715
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
22
DXOmark tests are garbage, basically.
Posts: 8,009
Threads: 1,852
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
Well, all I can say for now is that it seems to be well centered. ;-)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 2,725
Threads: 595
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
15
A good thing this review will be discussed in almost any photography community on this planet, practically what I am expecting is a close call.
Both lenses are excellent and differences are minor.
The question is will Sony rely on digital correction even in high end lenses ?? the lens would have exceptional resolution figures throughout the range at the cost of some vignetting or distortions that are easy to correct
Posts: 558
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
6
What's wrong with digital corrections in a digital age?
Posts: 6,715
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
22
Distortion corrections cut resolution.
Posts: 558
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
6
Tehnically speaking, yes but in real world? What if there is plenty of resolution to work with? Unless it's really excessive corrections, I don't think there's any decrease in resolution that would be noticable except for in some careful lab testing scenarios.