Posts: 7,876
Threads: 1,812
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
39
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 7,876
Threads: 1,812
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
39
Ok, ok ;-)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 7,876
Threads: 1,812
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
39
We don't want to start an inflation of HRs, right? ;-)
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 2,985
Threads: 31
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
20
Well, you don't often find optical properties like these in a consumer APS-C zoom, right? But of course, it's your call.
Posts: 7,876
Threads: 1,812
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
39
Well, you can't expect wonders from the 16-50mm - that's the cheapest lens on the market.
The Sony 18-55m is quite nice in terms of BQ, less so optically though.
The best shot for reasonable money in this arena is the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Posts: 2,985
Threads: 31
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
20
I'm keeping my Nikon 16-50 on the camera at all times. It's barely bigger than the mount adapter (when retracted, of course) and the image quality is fine.