12-26-2011, 03:28 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1324896405' post='14129']
And the Sigma 24-60mm f2.8 is not really much shorter in focal length range than the Canon 24-70, and it is probably better than the Tamron (have no comparative tests). Also for a fraction of the price.
[/quote]
I've been considering that one myself occasionally. However, it's a bit hard to find nowadays, and unfortunately no one so far offered a loaner so I could get an impression beforehand (hint, hint <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> ).
-- Markus
And the Sigma 24-60mm f2.8 is not really much shorter in focal length range than the Canon 24-70, and it is probably better than the Tamron (have no comparative tests). Also for a fraction of the price.
[/quote]
I've been considering that one myself occasionally. However, it's a bit hard to find nowadays, and unfortunately no one so far offered a loaner so I could get an impression beforehand (hint, hint <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
![Wink Wink](https://forum.opticallimits.com/images/smilies/wink.png)
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com