Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC
#15
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1328545011' post='15543']

I don't think so. I think that there is no need of VR in this focal range by proffesionals. Saying that I exclude the huge group of reach amateurs.[/quote]



You are only thinking of event photography where motion blur is a problem and minimal shutter speed should at least be 1/50 sec. In this case, I agree VR/IS is not required. However, for shots of stationary subjects in low light, VR/IS will come in handy.
  


Messages In This Thread
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Martin_MM - 02-06-2012, 12:24 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Rover - 02-06-2012, 01:32 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by mst - 02-06-2012, 02:04 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Guest - 02-06-2012, 02:37 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Guest - 02-06-2012, 02:44 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by mst - 02-06-2012, 03:51 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by miro - 02-06-2012, 04:13 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by miro - 02-06-2012, 04:16 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by popo - 02-06-2012, 04:34 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by borisbg - 02-06-2012, 05:16 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by youpii - 02-06-2012, 06:59 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by youpii - 02-06-2012, 07:22 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Klaus - 02-06-2012, 07:48 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Rover - 02-06-2012, 08:28 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Guest - 02-06-2012, 09:15 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by miro - 02-06-2012, 09:47 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by miro - 02-06-2012, 10:03 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by mst - 02-06-2012, 10:36 PM
Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC - by Rover - 02-07-2012, 08:56 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)