03-25-2012, 05:03 AM
I can Imagine you want to be careful with sharpening. However, now it seems as if the NEX-7 is the worst of the high resolution cameras. For the Nikon D3x the maximum is 4000, for the Canon 5DII the max is 3700, for Sony FF the max is 3600. And if I remember correctly, you have been commenting on the rather strong AA filter of the a900, compared to, for example, the 5DII .
You have been rather negative about the NEX-7, and I can see where you are coming from. But one of the aspects where it really shines, pure resolution, you have played down the performance to avoid certain a discussion that, in itself, has nothing to do with the camera but with the way it is tested.
And although it has been stated many times in the past that results are not cross platform comparable, I doubt many people looking at the results are aware of that. I would expect most people visiting your site will look at the test result and never read the forum.
Is it not be possible, that when you showed more comparable resolution figures, it would also become clear that one of the problems with such a camera is the enormous resolution potential, asking a lot of even the best lenses?
You have been rather negative about the NEX-7, and I can see where you are coming from. But one of the aspects where it really shines, pure resolution, you have played down the performance to avoid certain a discussion that, in itself, has nothing to do with the camera but with the way it is tested.
And although it has been stated many times in the past that results are not cross platform comparable, I doubt many people looking at the results are aware of that. I would expect most people visiting your site will look at the test result and never read the forum.
Is it not be possible, that when you showed more comparable resolution figures, it would also become clear that one of the problems with such a camera is the enormous resolution potential, asking a lot of even the best lenses?