03-27-2012, 10:31 AM
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1332839075' post='17086']
Min. focus distance @300mm = 0,45m with max. mag. ratio of 1:3,2x... Quite a fit for close up lovers also...[/quote]
Well, not really significantly more than what other lenses offer (the 18-270 Tamrons for example). And since the 300/4 primes give similar magnification at three times the focus distance, we can (again) expect serious focus breathing, too. But that's hardly a surprise.
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1332839075' post='17086']
But I assume seeing the distortion chart dancing like a belly dancer will be a given <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />...
[/quote]
Most likely, yes <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
-- Markus
Min. focus distance @300mm = 0,45m with max. mag. ratio of 1:3,2x... Quite a fit for close up lovers also...[/quote]
Well, not really significantly more than what other lenses offer (the 18-270 Tamrons for example). And since the 300/4 primes give similar magnification at three times the focus distance, we can (again) expect serious focus breathing, too. But that's hardly a surprise.
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1332839075' post='17086']
But I assume seeing the distortion chart dancing like a belly dancer will be a given <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />...[/quote]
Most likely, yes <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com