03-28-2012, 08:32 AM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1332922164' post='17115']
You are wrong <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
The Nikon 80-200mm D was tested in 2006, and there certainly was no D3x in 2006. The lens was tested on a D200 APS-C. The Sigma is new, and has been tested on a full frame. So, you can not compare them with the lenstip tests.
[/quote]
Yes, I made a mistake. Perhaps the comparison to Sigma given in the AF-D 80-200mm f2.8 test by lenstip referred to the old Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 tested on D200 too.
You are wrong <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />The Nikon 80-200mm D was tested in 2006, and there certainly was no D3x in 2006. The lens was tested on a D200 APS-C. The Sigma is new, and has been tested on a full frame. So, you can not compare them with the lenstip tests.
[/quote]
Yes, I made a mistake. Perhaps the comparison to Sigma given in the AF-D 80-200mm f2.8 test by lenstip referred to the old Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 tested on D200 too.