04-08-2012, 07:29 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1333869889' post='17378']
I didn't say "no", I only said "later". Or do you consider it of higher priority than for example the AF-D 24-85, the AF-S 28-70, 24-120 VR (the old one), the Tamron 28-75 and 24-70VC?
-- Markus
[/quote]
Certainly not higher priority than the AF-S 28-70 and Tamron 24-70 VC. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
I do consider it higher priority than the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 (we already know how it performs, tested on Sony and Canon) and the Nikon 24-120 VR old one ( already know that one is not a great performer too).
I didn't say "no", I only said "later". Or do you consider it of higher priority than for example the AF-D 24-85, the AF-S 28-70, 24-120 VR (the old one), the Tamron 28-75 and 24-70VC?
-- Markus
[/quote]
Certainly not higher priority than the AF-S 28-70 and Tamron 24-70 VC. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />
I do consider it higher priority than the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 (we already know how it performs, tested on Sony and Canon) and the Nikon 24-120 VR old one ( already know that one is not a great performer too).