04-09-2012, 09:05 AM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1333870198' post='17379']
I do consider it higher priority than the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 (we already know how it performs, tested on Sony and Canon) and the Nikon 24-120 VR old one ( already know that one is not a great performer too).
[/quote]
Well, at least on our D200 the reviewed 24-120 VR performed quite well. And price wise there's not much difference nowadays between a used 24-120 VR and a 28-105. So, when taking its dropped value into account to, the VR lens might still be worth a thought.
-- Markus
I do consider it higher priority than the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 (we already know how it performs, tested on Sony and Canon) and the Nikon 24-120 VR old one ( already know that one is not a great performer too).
[/quote]
Well, at least on our D200 the reviewed 24-120 VR performed quite well. And price wise there's not much difference nowadays between a used 24-120 VR and a 28-105. So, when taking its dropped value into account to, the VR lens might still be worth a thought.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com