04-21-2012, 02:18 PM
okay
maybe the 100-400 i tested had some issues already.
after all it had been a used lens
ive read about the softness of the sigma wide open, which is
almost too bad, since it was very interesting to me since it is
the faster lens, and that can be really great when shooting in a city,
following objects that suddenly get into a shadowy zone, which can happen quick here.
edit, as for the rain, got an promissing assignment this summer, but when all
odds are against me, it means i am in the woods for two weeks with downpouring rain..already got some lens covers for that, but that should awnser your questin about the water <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
anyway
that means to me i must test the 100-400 again.
goign to do that right now
cya and thx sofar
maybe the 100-400 i tested had some issues already.
after all it had been a used lens
ive read about the softness of the sigma wide open, which is
almost too bad, since it was very interesting to me since it is
the faster lens, and that can be really great when shooting in a city,
following objects that suddenly get into a shadowy zone, which can happen quick here.
edit, as for the rain, got an promissing assignment this summer, but when all
odds are against me, it means i am in the woods for two weeks with downpouring rain..already got some lens covers for that, but that should awnser your questin about the water <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />anyway
that means to me i must test the 100-400 again.
goign to do that right now
cya and thx sofar