07-21-2012, 08:35 PM
[quote name='nandadevieast' timestamp='1342900060' post='19525']
Hi,
Its said that the SLT's are 1/3 to 1/2 stop behind the normal SLR's, because less light reaches the sensor.
What exactly the "less light reaches the sensor" means, and what are the implications?
Does this mean that if i shot at 1/250, F8 and ISO 1600 on both the cameras, the SLT image will be 1/3 stops underexposed compared to the normal SLR?
Are the implications limited to high ISO noise only?
best regards,
anurag
[/quote]
yes, this is roughly correct.
However, there is no mirror slap which compensates a bit of the loss due to the lack of mirror-induced vibrations.
Hi,
Its said that the SLT's are 1/3 to 1/2 stop behind the normal SLR's, because less light reaches the sensor.
What exactly the "less light reaches the sensor" means, and what are the implications?
Does this mean that if i shot at 1/250, F8 and ISO 1600 on both the cameras, the SLT image will be 1/3 stops underexposed compared to the normal SLR?
Are the implications limited to high ISO noise only?
best regards,
anurag
[/quote]
yes, this is roughly correct.
However, there is no mirror slap which compensates a bit of the loss due to the lack of mirror-induced vibrations.