12-17-2012, 05:48 PM
Hi zoners,
You will surely find this link elsewhere :
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Looking-for-new-photo-gear-DxOMark-s-Perceptual-Megapixel-can-help-you
I like the approach and the new readability it provides on some key problems (their example of the Sigma new killer on modest bodies) but I'm not sure how it's going to provide much added value (there are still many other parameters) in the end as most people will still look for "best" rather than "good enough" given cameras have such a short lifespan that it is seen as a replaceable.
Also, what I found interesting is the huge gap between FF vs APS-C/FT/MFT systems. And also how MFT primes were only overlapping with high class APS-C zoom lenses (typical 7D + 17-55 for instance).
What do you think of this new scale ?
Greetings,
S.
edited : terrible english today...
You will surely find this link elsewhere :
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Looking-for-new-photo-gear-DxOMark-s-Perceptual-Megapixel-can-help-you
I like the approach and the new readability it provides on some key problems (their example of the Sigma new killer on modest bodies) but I'm not sure how it's going to provide much added value (there are still many other parameters) in the end as most people will still look for "best" rather than "good enough" given cameras have such a short lifespan that it is seen as a replaceable.
Also, what I found interesting is the huge gap between FF vs APS-C/FT/MFT systems. And also how MFT primes were only overlapping with high class APS-C zoom lenses (typical 7D + 17-55 for instance).
What do you think of this new scale ?
Greetings,
S.
edited : terrible english today...