03-04-2013, 06:26 PM
Firstly, they are a very nice set that you have there.
But it's not a question of being bored but there's really nothing that I can comment as I don't have either lens.
However, I do have the 70-200 f2.8 II and can say that it's the best versatile lens that I have. I imagine that the 70-200 f4 is pretty close.
The 100-300 seem really good so I would suggest that you stay with it. I don't see any compelling reason to get a 70-200 if you are happy with the 100-300.
Of course if you are planning to get a D800 then I can definitely recommend the 70-200 II. The details, even on a heavily cropped image is simply mind blogging.
Here is a shot at medium size (5520x3680) 20MP but downsized (remember a full sized image is 36MP):
http://www.studor13.si/music/photos/PZ/_D8B4411-2.jpg
And here is the cropped:
http://www.studor13.si/music/photos/PZ/_D8B4411.jpg
So, it's not just about being able to crop but the details that are still there.
But it's not a question of being bored but there's really nothing that I can comment as I don't have either lens.
However, I do have the 70-200 f2.8 II and can say that it's the best versatile lens that I have. I imagine that the 70-200 f4 is pretty close.
The 100-300 seem really good so I would suggest that you stay with it. I don't see any compelling reason to get a 70-200 if you are happy with the 100-300.
Of course if you are planning to get a D800 then I can definitely recommend the 70-200 II. The details, even on a heavily cropped image is simply mind blogging.
Here is a shot at medium size (5520x3680) 20MP but downsized (remember a full sized image is 36MP):
http://www.studor13.si/music/photos/PZ/_D8B4411-2.jpg
And here is the cropped:
http://www.studor13.si/music/photos/PZ/_D8B4411.jpg
So, it's not just about being able to crop but the details that are still there.