Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 v. Sigma AF 17-50 2.8?
#4
I agree with BC, I found it a very nice lens on Nikon, too. The only thing annoying to me was the turning distance ring in front of the lens, and the small angle between closest distance and infinity. Made it a bit fiddly to focus manually. Maybe you want to look at Sigma 17-70/2.8-4?
  


Messages In This Thread
Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 v. Sigma AF 17-50 2.8? - by SamuraiMalo - 05-12-2014, 08:51 PM
Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 v. Sigma AF 17-50 2.8? - by JJ_SO - 05-13-2014, 06:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)