09-17-2014, 04:39 AM
This is cool! = 21mm f1.9 in terms of FX. I love it, but I don't know if I will love the price also.
Indeed it is not ridiculously big, if you compare it to the 17.5mm f0.95: 586g vs 540g, 82mm x 77mm vs 80mm vs 63mm. The 10.5mm is fatter only at its head end.
The minimum focus distance of 17cm is also quite impressive.
![[Image: Voigtlander-10-5mm-on-Olympus-OMD-EM5-P1...fe721e.jpg]](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj524/picrumors/picrumors001/picrumors001103/Voigtlander-10-5mm-on-Olympus-OMD-EM5-P1670235_1410887202_zps3efe721e.jpg)
![[Image: voitglander-10-5-mm-095-5_1410887107_zps668b4aba.jpg]](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj524/picrumors/picrumors001/picrumors001103/voitglander-10-5-mm-095-5_1410887107_zps668b4aba.jpg)
Indeed it is not ridiculously big, if you compare it to the 17.5mm f0.95: 586g vs 540g, 82mm x 77mm vs 80mm vs 63mm. The 10.5mm is fatter only at its head end.
The minimum focus distance of 17cm is also quite impressive.
![[Image: Voigtlander-10-5mm-on-Olympus-OMD-EM5-P1...fe721e.jpg]](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj524/picrumors/picrumors001/picrumors001103/Voigtlander-10-5mm-on-Olympus-OMD-EM5-P1670235_1410887202_zps3efe721e.jpg)
![[Image: voitglander-10-5-mm-095-5_1410887107_zps668b4aba.jpg]](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj524/picrumors/picrumors001/picrumors001103/voitglander-10-5-mm-095-5_1410887107_zps668b4aba.jpg)