08-02-2011, 09:02 AM
Hi,
dcwatch have reviews on both lenses ([url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/date_lens/20100428_364184.html"]Sigma 50 - 500[/url] and T[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/lens/2007/09/04/6918.html"]amron 200 - 500[/url]), however on different bodies, and Tamron on Nikon D200, so bit outdated. Anyway they are good for real life examples. Google translate might help also <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
A.
P.S. they have and [url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/date_lens/20090625_296051.html"]Sigma 150 - 500mm[/url].
dcwatch have reviews on both lenses ([url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/date_lens/20100428_364184.html"]Sigma 50 - 500[/url] and T[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/lens/2007/09/04/6918.html"]amron 200 - 500[/url]), however on different bodies, and Tamron on Nikon D200, so bit outdated. Anyway they are good for real life examples. Google translate might help also <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />. A.
P.S. they have and [url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/date_lens/20090625_296051.html"]Sigma 150 - 500mm[/url].