Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8
#10
Aren't these a little ... ah ... large for f/1.8 ?

While 'Art'-like, still no statement about improved QC (and yes, Tamron, you could also do some homework on this ...).

It was also about time that they improved their rather crappy finish honestly speaking.

  


Messages In This Thread
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by Rover - 09-02-2015, 11:37 AM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by Rover - 09-02-2015, 01:51 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by JJ_SO - 09-02-2015, 03:40 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by borisbg - 09-02-2015, 05:08 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by davidmanze - 09-02-2015, 06:14 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by Rover - 09-02-2015, 06:30 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by Klaus - 09-02-2015, 08:23 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by popo - 09-02-2015, 08:27 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by davidmanze - 09-03-2015, 06:05 AM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by JJ_SO - 09-03-2015, 07:43 AM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by davidmanze - 09-03-2015, 07:44 AM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by JJ_SO - 09-03-2015, 09:43 AM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by davidmanze - 09-03-2015, 07:38 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by Rover - 10-14-2015, 11:15 AM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by borisbg - 10-19-2015, 05:47 PM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by Rover - 10-20-2015, 11:36 AM
New Tamron twins: 35/1.8 and 45/1.8 - by Rover - 10-20-2015, 04:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)