08-14-2015, 08:39 AM
For my wildlife uses, I actually did wonder how the CX70-300 would do, but it would have the "backward zoom" problem for me. Then again, if it was really that good (along with some V series body) it might even be enough for me to ditch Canon totally and start again with system(s) with opposite zoom ring operation. I don't mind which way it goes, but I will only own at any one time systems which turn the same way. I've already made the switch once when going Sony SLR > Oly 4/3 + Canon.
For the Fuji "green" issue, is this something to do with the X-trans or whatever they call it sensor? I would have thought, given its increased proportion dedicated to green detection, it should be even better than typical bayer? Or could it be a software issue of optimisation in RAW converters?
For the Fuji "green" issue, is this something to do with the X-trans or whatever they call it sensor? I would have thought, given its increased proportion dedicated to green detection, it should be even better than typical bayer? Or could it be a software issue of optimisation in RAW converters?
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.